CO129-177 - Sir Kennedy Acting Governor Austin Lieut Governor Hennessy - 1877 [1-5] — Page 348

CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案 All AI Reviewed

346

drops this serious

Constable and

says

charge against the

he went direct

from the steam ferry to the mataket of the 3rd prisoner. that on the invitation of that 3rd prisoner he sat down and that shortly afterwards the police came and took him there.

own

The case for the prosecution against Leung a futh is as clear as Chinese testimony can be—his story is inconsistent with that case but it is not consistent with itself. I see no reason to doubt the justice of this conviction.

My suspicion on the whole case is that the two first prisoners—really employed by somebody—were set to catch Tan Chee Wan whilst smuggling; that failing to find him with Opium in China waters, the two first prisoners attacked him on British waters; that emboldened by recent immunity they committed a robbery within this harbour.

a crime which it was the duty of the Supreme Court to put down with a strong hand by punishment the most deterrent. If the act had been avowed by the Chinese Government as done under its authority, the outrage would have assumed very large proportions taking the case out of the jurisdiction of the judicature.

(signed) John Smale,

Chief Justice. Hongkong, February 2nd. 1877.

Edit History

2026-05-21 16:11:02 · NVIDIA / meta/llama-4-maverick-17b-128e-instruct
Live
View comparison
AI Proofread
346 drops this serious Constable and says charge against the he went direct from the steam ferry to the mataket of the 3rd prisoner. that on the invitation of that 3rd prisoner he sat down and that shortly afterwards the police came and took him there. own The case for the prosecution against Leung a futh is as clear as Chinese testimony can be—his story is inconsistent with that case but it is not consistent with itself. I see no reason to doubt the justice of this conviction. My suspicion on the whole case is that the two first prisoners—really employed by somebody—were set to catch Tan Chee Wan whilst smuggling; that failing to find him with Opium in China waters, the two first prisoners attacked him on British waters; that emboldened by recent immunity they committed a robbery within this harbour. a crime which it was the duty of the Supreme Court to put down with a strong hand by punishment the most deterrent. If the act had been avowed by the Chinese Government as done under its authority, the outrage would have assumed very large proportions taking the case out of the jurisdiction of the judicature. (signed) John Smale, Chief Justice. Hongkong, February 2nd. 1877.
Baseline (Original)
346 drops this serious Constable and says charge against the he went direct from the steam ferry to the mataked of the 3rd prisoner. that on the invitation of that 3rd prisoner he_ sat down and that shortly afterwards the police came and took him there. own The case for the prosecution against Leung a futh is as clear as chinese testimony san be_his story is inconsistent with that case but it is not consistent with itself. I see no reason to doubt the justice of this conviction. My suspicion on the whole ease is that the two first prisoners - really employed by somebody were to eatch Tan chee wan whilst sunggling that failing to find him with Opium in china waters the two first prisoners attacked him on British waters, that emboldened by recent immunity they committed a robbery within this harbour. a crime which it was the duty of the Irepreme Court to put .__ down with a strong hand by. punishment the most deterrent. If the act had been avowed by the. Chinese Government as done under its authority, the outrage would have - assumed very large proportions taking the case out of the jurisdiction of - the judicature. (signed) John Smale, Chief Justice. Hongkong, February 2nd. 1877.
2026-05-21 16:11:02 · Baseline
View content

346

drops this serious

Constable and

says

charge against the

he went direct

from the steam ferry to the mataked of the 3rd prisoner. that on the invitation of that 3rd prisoner he_ sat down and that shortly afterwards the police came and took him there.

own

The case for the prosecution against Leung a futh is as clear as chinese testimony

san be_his story is inconsistent with that case but it is not consistent with itself. I see no reason to doubt the justice of this conviction.

My suspicion

on the whole

ease is that the two first prisoners

- really employed by somebody

were

to eatch Tan chee wan whilst sunggling that failing to find him with Opium in china waters the two first prisoners

attacked him on British waters, that

emboldened by recent immunity they committed a robbery within this

harbour.

a crime which it was the

duty of the Irepreme Court to put .__ down with a strong hand by. punishment the most deterrent. If the act had been avowed by the. Chinese Government as done under its authority, the outrage would have - assumed very large proportions taking the case out of the jurisdiction of - the judicature.

(signed) John Smale,

Chief Justice. Hongkong, February 2nd. 1877.

Comments

Approved members can add comments, bookmarks, and private notes.

No comments yet.

Private Research Note

Private notes are available after approval.